The actors that actually target the Gulf.

Not an encyclopedia. 9 dossiers on the threat actors with recorded victimology in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain — each one written as a detection plan rather than a description, with its tooling purpose-mapped, its sourcing graded and its gaps published.

Dossiers
9 Gulf victimology, reviewed monthly
Detection behaviours
137 ranked by durability, not novelty
Tools mapped
134 each with a derived purpose
Techniques
477 ATT&CK, unplaced ones counted

Why these read differently

We publish the gaps, the grades and the weights

An actor profile that only lists what is known is unusable for defence: you cannot tell whether a quiet actor is dormant or simply unobserved. Every dossier here carries four things the category leaves out — a ranked detection plan with the reason each behaviour survives retooling, a toolkit split into what identifies the actor and what does not, Admiralty grades separating primary research from the outlets repeating it, and an explicit statement of what we do not know.

Tiers

Pyramid-of-Pain tier for each behaviour. Tier 1–2 costs the actor an afternoon to change; tier 5–6 costs them their tradecraft. We rank by tier, not by how recent the reporting is.

Admiralty grades

A letter for source reliability, a number for the credibility of the claim. B2 is primary vendor research; C3 is an outlet reporting on someone else's work. Ten C3s are not a corroboration.

ICD 203 language

ALMOST CERTAIN, LIKELY, UNLIKELY — the US intelligence community's estimative lexicon, with confidence stated separately from likelihood. No "may potentially".

The library

9 dossiers

Ordered by depth of technique coverage. Reviewed monthly; the review date is on every page.

The same method, on your estate

Your coverage against all nine, measured.

The library is the part we can publish. The platform runs the same detection plan against your own estate, tells you which of these behaviours you already cover, and retro-hunts the rest — on your hardware, with nothing leaving the building.

❯ ESC

THE TRACE · LOCAL INFERENCE · REASONING SHOWN STEP-BY-STEP

Try: “which of our vendors were hit by qilin” · “fortios exposure” · “what changed on our perimeter this week”