APT35 — what to detect, and what we don’t know.

Credential phishing at scale against Gulf government and academic mail.

78 techniques 19 detection behaviours 13 tools mapped Kuwait, Saudi Arabia

Also tracked as  Newscaster Team · Magic Hound · G0059 · Phosphorus · Mint Sandstorm · TunnelVision · COBALT MIRAGE · Agent Serpens · RICH ION · PHOSPHORUS · CHARMING KITTEN · Parastoo

Attributed to
IR State-sponsored, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Gulf victimology
2 Kuwait, Saudi Arabia
Techniques
78 across 14 tactics
Tooling
13 3 actor-specific · 10 commodity
Reporting
20 7 outlets · 32 research hosts

Summary

The short version

APT35 is a threat actor attributed to State-sponsored, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), assessed as information theft and espionage-motivated. Its recorded targeting runs to defense, education, energy, financial and adjacent sectors across 22 countries in the open reporting we hold — Kuwait, Saudi Arabia among them.

Across 78 attributed ATT&CK techniques we resolve 19 distinct behaviours — the things they do that a detection can be written against. The two that account for most of their observed tradecraft are discovery command burst on one host and valid account abuse or account creation. Their toolkit is 13 named items: 3 we see only in this actor's reporting and 10 commodity or dual-use. That ratio is the point — the first group is what identifies them, the second is what they share with every other group and with red teams.

For a Gulf defender the relevant line is the victimology: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia appear in the reporting behind this record. That is evidence of past targeting, not a forecast, and it is drawn from what vendors chose to publish — an actor working quietly in a market nobody reports on looks identical to one that is absent.

As MITRE describes them: “FireEye has identified APT35 operations dating back to 2014. APT35, also known as the Newscaster Team, is a threat group sponsored by the Iranian government that conducts long term, resource-intensive operations to collect strategic intelligence. APT35 typically targets U.S. and the Middle Eastern military, diplomatic and government personnel, organizations in the media, energy and defense industrial base (DIB), and engineering, business services and telecommunications sectors.” — MITRE ATT&CK, CC BY 4.0.

On the name. “APT35” labels a cluster of related activity tracked under one name — not a verified organisation. Whether one team, several contractors or a rotating cast sits behind it is not something this record establishes, and the vendor names below are separate groupings that only mostly overlap.

02 — The detection plan

What to detect, ranked by what survives their retooling

Most actor profiles hand you indicators that expire in days. These are the behaviours the actor cannot drop without changing how they operate, each with the reason it holds. Weight is our own: how much of the actor's observed tradecraft the behaviour accounts for.

D2

Persistence pointing into world-writable staging

Tier 1–2

The persistence mechanism and the directory it points at both outlive the payload. The discriminator is the TARGET PATH, not the task or key name, which the actor can change freely.

8 techniques · weight 5

D3

Credential access against LSASS

Tier 3–5

Few legitimate processes read LSASS memory, so precision is high in most estates once the agents that do are excluded.

2 techniques · weight 5

D4

Web shell written into a served directory

Tier 3

A script file appearing under a web root outside a deployment window is close to a binary signal, and it catches the entry vector rather than the aftermath.

2 techniques · weight 5

D5

User-facing application spawning an interpreter

Tier 3

The delivery wrapper changes constantly; an office, archive or browser process parenting a shell is the same shape across all of them.

8 techniques · weight 5

D8

Security tooling stopped, unloaded or blinded

Tier 3

Nothing legitimate disables the estate's own defences at endpoint scale, and the action reliably precedes the part of the intrusion you care about.

9 techniques · weight 5

D10

Backup destruction or encryption at scale

Context

Shadow-copy deletion and service stops precede the encryption by minutes — that window is the only one where a detection still changes the outcome.

8 techniques · weight 5

D1

Sanctioned SaaS platform as command or exfil channel

Tier 5–6

Defeats egress-domain control outright — the destination is a platform the estate already permits, so no blocklist and no TLD heuristic will see it.

7 techniques · weight 4

D6

Credential store or keystroke capture

Tier 3

Kept separate from the LSASS rule because it needs different telemetry and tunes differently — a browser credential store read by a non-browser process is its own signal.

8 techniques · weight 4

D7

Vendor-suggestive name outside that vendor's paths

Tier 4

Encodes the naming RULE rather than the filenames, so it survives every rename. The convention is a habit; the names are inventory.

6 techniques · weight 4

D9

Encoded or obfuscated interpreter invocation

Tier 3

The command-line SHAPE — the flag combination, not the payload — is stable for months to years and cheap to match.

8 techniques · weight 4

D16

Execution brokered through WMI or a native API

Tier 3

Chosen to avoid a shell, so command-line rules miss it entirely. The broker is a stable choice; what it runs is not.

6 techniques · weight 4

D11

Living-off-the-land download of a second stage

Tier 5

The set of system binaries that can fetch a file is small and changes with the OS, not with the actor.

5 techniques · weight 3

D12

Remote service or share used to move laterally

Tier 3

Lateral movement leaves a service-creation or admin-share write that is the same regardless of the tool that made it.

6 techniques · weight 3

D13

Collection staged into an archive before egress

Tier 3

Staging is a step the actor cannot skip, and it happens before the data leaves — the last cheap place to catch it.

7 techniques · weight 3

D14

Exploitation of an internet-facing service

Context

Not a durable behavioural signature but the entry vector for a large public estate — worth an exposure control even where the detection is weak.

3 techniques · weight 3

D15

Protocol tunnelling or an internal proxy hop

Tier 5

The tunneller is a tool choice that persists for months, and the traffic shape is visible even when the payload is not.

8 techniques · weight 3

D17

Valid account abuse or account creation

Tier 5

Produces no malware event at all — the only trace is in identity telemetry, which is why an endpoint-only programme has a blind spot exactly here.

10 techniques · weight 3

D18

Beaconing to attacker infrastructure over web protocols

Tier 6–7

The URI shape and cadence are cheap to match and hold for weeks to months — but the destination itself rotates in days, so match the pattern rather than the host.

7 techniques · weight 3

D19

Discovery command burst on one host

Context

No single discovery command is worth an alert. The DENSITY is — several distinct recon binaries on one host inside an hour is a shape ordinary use does not produce.

17 techniques · weight 2

How to score it

No single behaviour here is worth waking someone. Summed weights of 6 on one host inside a window is an alert; 10 is an incident. The pair that most reliably means this actor rather than commodity crime is Persistence pointing into world-writable staging + Credential access against LSASS — seen together, treat as an incident regardless of total.

03 — Tooling

13 named tools, and what each is for

Purpose is derived, not asserted: each tool's own ATT&CK techniques are resolved to tactics, and the tactics it spends most of its techniques in are what it is for.

Actor-specific means we have no record of it outside this actor's reporting — those are the names that identify them. Commodity covers everything sold, published or shared: Cobalt Strike and Brute Ratel are licensed red-team software every pentester owns, Mimikatz and Impacket are public, and backdoors like ShadowPad circulate between unrelated groups. Finding a commodity tool tells you far less, which is exactly why the split is drawn. ATT&CK's own “malware vs tool” type answers a different question — whether the software is malicious — so it is not used for this.

Actor-specific — 3 items

CharmPower Actor-specific

Gathering data and moving data out.

S0674  ·  24 techniques  ·  Collection, Exfiltration, Command and Control
PowerLess Actor-specific

Gathering data and remote control.

S1012  ·  9 techniques  ·  Collection, Command and Control, Discovery
DownPaper Actor-specific

Staying resident and network reconnaissance.

S0186  ·  7 techniques  ·  Persistence, Discovery, Execution

Commodity and dual-use — 10 items

Pupy Commodity

Credential theft and gathering data.

S0192  ·  41 techniques  ·  Credential Access, Collection, Persistence
Mimikatz Commodity

Credential theft and moving between hosts.

S0002  ·  17 techniques  ·  Credential Access, Lateral Movement, Persistence
Net Commodity

Staying resident and moving between hosts.

S0039  ·  16 techniques  ·  Persistence, Lateral Movement, Discovery
Impacket Commodity

Credential theft and moving between hosts.

S0357  ·  11 techniques  ·  Credential Access, Lateral Movement, Execution
FRP Commodity

Remote control and network reconnaissance.

S1144  ·  10 techniques  ·  Command and Control, Discovery, Execution
PsExec Commodity

Moving between hosts and staying resident.

S0029  ·  5 techniques  ·  Lateral Movement, Persistence, Execution
netsh Commodity

Privilege escalation and remote control.

S0108  ·  4 techniques  ·  Privilege Escalation, Command and Control, Defense Impairment
Ping Commodity

Network reconnaissance.

S0097  ·  1 techniques  ·  Discovery
Systeminfo Commodity

Network reconnaissance.

S0096  ·  1 techniques  ·  Discovery
ipconfig Commodity

Network reconnaissance.

S0100  ·  1 techniques  ·  Discovery
No data

File hashes for APT35’s own tooling

We hold none. Our corpus carries 9,780 hashes, but they come from live feeds covering current commodity campaigns — not the decade-old actor-specific backdoors in the list above. ATT&CK itself publishes no sample hashes; it is a technique knowledge base. Where a sample would have to come from a third party’s family tag rather than from this actor’s reporting, we leave the row empty instead of implying an attribution we cannot support.

04 — Coverage, honestly counted

Where the 78 techniques actually go

Of the techniques attributed to APT35, 55 fold into the detection plan above, 15 describe preparation you cannot see from inside your network, and 8 are uncatalogued — we have not yet placed them. That last number is published on purpose; it is the honest size of the gap.

Discovery12
Stealth11
Command and Control8
Reconnaissance8
Collection7
Execution7
Resource Development7
Persistence5
Defense Impairment4
Initial Access4
Lateral Movement2
Credential Access1
Exfiltration1
Impact1

05 — The chain

The order it happens in

The same techniques as above, sequenced. Useful for deciding where to spend a detection: the earlier a tactic sits, the more of the intrusion you still get to prevent.

01
Reconnaissance
8 techniques
02
Resource Development
7 techniques
03
Initial Access
4 techniques
04
Execution
7 techniques
05
Persistence
5 techniques
06
Credential Access
1 technique
07
Discovery
12 techniques
08
Lateral Movement
2 techniques
09
Collection
7 techniques
10
Command and Control
8 techniques
11
Exfiltration
1 technique
12
Impact
1 technique
13
Stealth
11 techniques
14
Defense Impairment
4 techniques

06 — Tradecraft artefacts

Concrete strings, each with the report it came from

Pulled from primary vendor research and kept attributed. These are hunt starting points, not detections — a path an actor used once is worth a query, not a rule.

ArtefactKind First reported byDate
%temp%\thinking_robot_log.txt file path The Hacker News 2025-11-05

07 — Sourcing, graded

Who told us, and how much that is worth

NATO Admiralty grading. The letter is the source's reliability, the number the credibility of the claim. We separate primary vendor research from outlets reporting on it, because ten articles derived from one report is one report.

GradeSourceBasis
B2MITRE actor record62 references across 32 distinct research hosts
C3Cloudsek9 items — reporting on other vendors' research
C3The Hacker News5 items — reporting on other vendors' research
B2Recorded Future2 items — primary vendor research
C3Dark Reading1 item — reporting on other vendors' research
B2Check Point1 item — primary vendor research
C3SecurityWeek1 item — reporting on other vendors' research
—Estate telemetryno data — absent, not negative

20 items · 7 outlets · 45% of reporting traces to a single outlet

08 — What we do not know

The gaps, published

Every vendor profile has these. Most omit them, which leaves you unable to tell a quiet actor from an unobserved one.

NO DATA

C2 URI fingerprints

No URI paths, headers or beacon sequences for any family we hold, and no URL indicators at all to derive them from — the indicator set is hashes, hosts and addresses.

NO DATA

Infrastructure

No domains are attributed to this actor in our holdings, so no naming convention, TLD preference or hosting pattern can be derived.

09 — Outlook

Forward judgements

Probability language is ICD 203. Likelihood and confidence are stated separately: how likely we think it is, and how good our basis is for thinking so.

Remains active
our newest reporting on this actor is from 2026-07-16, 65 days ago
ALMOST CERTAINconf HIGH
sanctioned SaaS platform as command or exfil channel continues
a tier-5–6 behaviour, which outlives the tooling that expresses it
VERY LIKELYconf MODERATE

10 — Primary sources

Every reference behind this record

62 of them. Published in full so the page can be checked rather than believed.

fireeye.comhttps://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/collateral/en/mtrends-2018.pdfattack.mitre.orghttps://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0059/cfr.orghttps://www.cfr.org/interactive/cyber-operations/magic-houndunit42.paloaltonetworks.comhttps://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/unit42-magic-hound-campaign-attacks-saudi-targets/securityaffairs.cohttps://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/56348/intelligence/magic-hound-campaign.htmlcfr.orghttps://www.cfr.org/cyber-operations/apt-35blogs.microsoft.comhttps://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2019/03/27/new-steps-to-protect-customers-from-hackingresearch.checkpoint.comhttps://research.checkpoint.com/2022/apt35-exploits-log4j-vulnerability-to-distribute-new-modulamicrosoft.comhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2021/11/16/evolving-trends-in-iranian-threat-actorsentinelone.comhttps://www.sentinelone.com/labs/log4j2-in-the-wild-iranian-aligned-threat-actor-tunnelvision-acsecureworks.comhttps://www.secureworks.com/blog/cobalt-mirage-conducts-ransomware-operations-in-usunit42.paloaltonetworks.comhttps://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/iranian-attackers-impersonate-model-agency/microsoft.comhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/29/defending-against-evolving-identity-attmicrosoft.comhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2024/01/17/new-ttps-observed-in-mint-sandstorm-cammicrosoft.comhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2023/04/18/nation-state-threat-actor-mint-sandstormicrosoft.comhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2022/09/07/profiling-dev-0270-phosphorus-ransomwarcloud.google.comhttps://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/updated-cyber-threat-actor-naming-systeapt.etda.or.thhttps://apt.etda.or.th/cgi-bin/showcard.cgi?u=bb9b25ed-9ddc-4f65-bd01-ab8d6efc34acclearskysec.comhttps://www.clearskysec.com/thamar-reservoir/secureworks.comhttps://www.secureworks.com/blog/iranian-pupyrat-bites-middle-eastern-organizationssecureworks.comhttps://www.secureworks.com/research/the-curious-case-of-mia-ashcyware.comhttps://cyware.com/news/iranian-apt-charming-kitten-impersonates-clearsky-the-security-firm-thatscmagazine.comhttps://www.scmagazine.com/home/security-news/cybercrime/hbo-breach-accomplished-with-hard-work-blog.certfa.comhttps://blog.certfa.com/posts/the-return-of-the-charming-kitten/clearskysec.comhttps://www.clearskysec.com/the-kittens-are-back-in-town/blogs.microsoft.comhttps://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2019/10/04/recent-cyberattacks-require-us-all-to-be-viclearskysec.comhttps://www.clearskysec.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/The-Kittens-Are-Back-in-Town-2.pdfblog.certfa.comhttps://blog.certfa.com/posts/fake-interview-the-new-activity-of-charming-kitten/darktrace.comhttps://www.darktrace.com/en/blog/apt-35-charming-kitten-discovered-in-a-pre-infected-environmenclearskysec.comhttps://www.clearskysec.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/The-Kittens-are-Back-in-Town-3.pdfblogs.microsoft.comhttps://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2020/09/10/cyberattacks-us-elections-trump-biden/proofpoint.comhttps://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/badblood-ta453-targets-us-and-israeli-medical-proofpoint.comhttps://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta453-refuses-be-bound-expectationsblog.certfa.comhttps://blog.certfa.com/posts/charming-kitten-christmas-gift/proofpoint.comhttps://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/operation-spoofedscholars-conversation-ta453cybereason.comhttps://www.cybereason.com/blog/powerless-trojan-iranian-apt-phosphorus-adds-new-powershell-backblog.checkpoint.comhttps://blog.checkpoint.com/2022/06/14/iranian-spear-phishing-operation-targets-former-israeli-ftherecord.mediahttps://therecord.media/log4shell-attacks-expand-to-nation-state-groups-from-china-iran-north-koblog.googlehttps://blog.google/threat-analysis-group/new-iranian-apt-data-extraction-tool/proofpoint.comhttps://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/above-fold-and-your-inbox-tracing-state-alignedeepinstinct.comhttps://www.deepinstinct.com/blog/iranian-threat-actor-continues-to-develop-mass-exploitation-towelivesecurity.comhttps://www.welivesecurity.com/en/eset-research/sponsor-batch-filed-whiskers-ballistic-bobcats-ssecureworks.comhttps://www.secureworks.com/blog/opsec-mistakes-reveal-cobalt-mirage-threat-actorsproofpoint.comhttps://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta453-uses-multi-persona-impersonation-capitalvolexity.comhttps://www.volexity.com/blog/2024/02/13/charmingcypress-innovating-persistence/thehackernews.comhttps://thehackernews.com/2023/03/iranian-hackers-target-women-involved.html

Run it against your own estate

Which of these 19 behaviours do you already detect?

The library is the part we can publish. The platform runs the same detection plan against your own estate, tells you which of these behaviours you already cover, and retro-hunts the rest — on your hardware, with nothing leaving the building.

❯ ESC

THE TRACE · LOCAL INFERENCE · REASONING SHOWN STEP-BY-STEP

Try: “which of our vendors were hit by qilin” · “fortios exposure” · “what changed on our perimeter this week”